EINSTEIN HATED THE IRRATIONAL CONTSTRUCTS OF GOD AND RELIGION

In response to this article by Daniel Peterson about science being overrated as a means to find truth, here are my thoughts:


Daniel Peterson obviously has no grasp of social sciences or about the writing of books, for "nonfiction" is merely written by people who either BELIEVE it's true (such as the mentally ill Margery Kempe dictating her biography about all of her sex with Jesus revirginizing her) or want to make YOU BELIEVE it's true (such as hate group propaganda).

History books are written by the victors, people delude themselves, political leaders sanitize (such as those who "edited" the Bible in the first place), and even 500 of the most honest people will give you a different eyewitness account of an event--and that's when they don't write about it DECADES later!! And don't even get me started on the con artist Joe Smith and how no one ever seems to have been allowed to call him out on any of his made-up manipulative crap. I mean, really, his first wife finds out he's married a second (the family maid) when she finds him boffing wife #2 in the barn! SHEESH!

Yep, it's definitely all blessed-like, like that moron/Mormon "Brother" Peterson said, and no sort of proof is needed to have it dictate our entire existence. I mean, hey, just because scientific testing has been done to disprove astrology and similar "spiritual" practices doesn't mean anything. Nope, because Satan is all over THAT kind of stuff. Mormons are soooooo different and only believe TRUE stuff. Right?

Sure, there are some historical accuracies to the Bible, just like there are in, say, Twilight. I mean, Seattle IS cloudy a lot. And there ARE high schools there. Well, there you GO! Vampires must exist in Seattle, or did at the time the books were written, and one of them was named Edward. And he met a virgin named Bella... See, all of those girls worshipping the books KNOW what they're talking about!